top of page
Frame 1010109850.png
Authoring Contracts in Microsoft Word

Designing a solution that lets enterprise users create contracts (offer letters, NDAs, SOWs, etc) with speed and accuracy using Smart templates that the legal teams setup in their organisations

Frame 1010109845.png

Complete walkthrough

In house demo video created with the team on what the Agreements experience is like

My role

There are four key user journeys in the project,

I was tasked to investigate and design solutions to the 2nd (document creation) and 3rd (Approval) phases

The team

3 designers, 2 teams (4 partner stakeholders), 10 Developers, 2 Product managers, 1 researcher, 1 Content designer, Accessibility experts.

Duration

5 months

2.png

01

Set up smart document templates & business approved clauses

Untitled-1.png

03

Send document for review and approval

Untitled.png

02

Generate documents using templates

Untitled-2.png

04

Send document for signatures 

Outcome

01

Designed document authoring and Approval experience that was

co-designed and tested with customer 0 and implemented in the MVP

02

Designed a product framework in Word by closely Collaborating with designers, Product managers & Engineering across Word and Syntex

Identifying user roles, jobs and issues

For better context

let's look at what a

Smart template does

Group 1321316423.png

Users and jobs involved in document creation

Judge.png

Kristien
Template creator

Para legal

​

  • Create templates

  • Defines who can use the template

  • Defines all conditions within template

  • Defines mandatory workflows within the template that documents that use the template should follow

Office worker.png

Luke
Documen
t creator

Business admin, owner or process manager

​

  • Find and use templates that they have access to

  • Fill the details within the document

  • Send the document for approval

  • Send the document for e signature

In tuxedo.png

Eric
Document approver

Senior stakeholder

​

  • View document and its details

  • Review and respond to the approval request

​

​

​

Problems with current process

Ring buoy.png

Dependency on paralegals during document creation

​

Users are forced to depend on SMEs to assist with authoring documents as this involves multiple steps that are specific to the type of document being created.

Four oclock.png

High learning time for paralegals to set up approvals in templates

​

Heavy workflow tools like power BI or APIs to setup approvals required time and energy to learn and implement

​

Frame 1010109850.png
Validating hypothesis and defining direction

Considerations from compete study and Word user mental modal

Most tasks in word are not structured however contract authoring is structured and have steps to follow to complete. the following considerations were set to understand what is most important at different phases of authoring.

Important for creating documents

01

Progress and sense of completion

User should know the status of generating the document

02

Guidance on next steps

Users can easily identify and navigate to the next step to take while creating the document and easily get answers to question that they are blocked on

03

Align with Word way of working

Users can should have an ability to either do the task inline or via the side panel

Important for approvals

01

Setup using plain language

The approval rule building experience for template creators should non technical and must be understood in plain language

02

Cater to complexity yet stay simple

Allow template creators to add rules when and if need when setting up a mediatory approval request for documents that get created from the template

03

Clarity between optional and mandatory 

It must be clear to the Document creators when an approval is mandatory for the document they are creating when it is setup within the template they used

Design principles

The foundational study done by a partner team as well as compete study helped us identify these common themes which were used to define the design principles based on the user expectations

Bullseye.png

Accuracy

Authors lack legal expertise for business document creation. The system must establish safeguards to prevent errors and unwanted content changes in the document.

​

Stopwatch.png

Speed

Contract authoring to execution is time-consuming, particularly in the stages of authoring, negotiation, and approval. The system should offer authoring assistance and workflow channels to reduce reliance on external support

Document authoring experience

The authoring lifecycle follows defined steps based on the document template.

Group 1321316424.png

Identifying entry points to find and select smart template

There are three entry points identified to start document authoring in Word by selecting a template.

Entry points considered

01

Via templates section in Word backstage

Uses the same space which users use to find templates that their company offers. However the task of using a template itself is very low from Word backstage.

Frame 2018776664.jpg

02

Via chrome ribbon actions in the Word app

An entry point within the 'Agreements' tab, a new section in Word that is visible to all enterprise users who have this feature enabled.But not the most common way to start the task of browsing templates.

Frame 2018776666.jpg

03

Via copilot in Word

(a chat based AI assistant)

As a response to a prompt in Microsoft Word's copilot. While users use Copilot to look up similar artifacts this can not be the only way to find templates as Copilot has different subscription to be enabled to use and might not be available to all enterprise users by defualt.

Frame 2018776665.jpg

Final direction for

selecting smart templates

Selected concept 2 strategically, as the business aims for users to initiate this task mainly from a centralized contract management app rather than in Word in the future. This requires minimizing implementation costs and reducing dependency on core Word code changes, given the limited short-term ROI.

Frame 2018776666.jpg

02

Via chrome ribbon actions in the Word app

Designing document

authoring experience

Users need education and guidance to complete the task of authoring as in most cases it is sequential in nature. We have asked ourselves...

  • How might we guide the users efficiently and minimise time spent on extra steps?


  • How might we ensure that the Word users find this as native to Word as possible and matches their thinking style?

  • How might we ensure reusability of patterns and components to handle the constraints?

Constraints 

Group 1321316430.png
Theme=3D.png

Constraint 01

Limiting majority of the design to the side panel and chrome Ribbon and not within document canvas as it involved a high execution time and cost.

Group 1321316431.png
Theme=3D.png

Constraint 02

Need to reuse the Word developer tool components for any indicators and interactions within Word document canvas

Concepts considered

01

A centralised place to author, track progress and collaborate

A panel based interaction where an overview of the tasks and next steps are communicated and users can track progress as they complete tasks.
Even though the panel is auto opened when the file is opened, there is need for education on how to open this panel back if the user happens to close it. 

Frame 2018776668.png

02

Enable authoring and guidance in the document canvas

Existing Word interactions such as 'Editor status card' and 'comment framework' are used to communicate the status of the authoring and focussed inline interactions are enabled to fill required details on the go. However we see a low click rates on the 'Status cards' from other features due to their poor discoverability.

Frame 2018776667.png

Final direction for

authoring experience

After testing the concepts with users we understood that:

​

  • Navigating from one to other field to fill in a long document might get difficult with the in line filling option

  • Users prefers the panel form based option to fill information for long documents while inline experience works best for editing post filling

  • Allowing users to fill information directly inline involved a high execution time and cost. This lead to the ask of designing solution outside of the document canvas but not within.

Frame 2018776668.png

01

A centralised place to author, track progress and collaborate

Solving issues identified from usability test

Frame 2018776670.png
Frame 2018776669.png
Frame 2018776671.png
Approval workflow experience

There are 2 types of approvals

ascsac.png

Type 01

Optional approval

requests

Optional approval request that document creators can create and request at any time while authoring document

Group 1321316451.png

Type 02

Mandatory conditional

approval requests

Mandatory approval request that document creators must send when a condition is met which is setup within a template they use

Type 01

Designing optional approval request flow

In order Ensure consistency with teams approval app framework to create approval request I started by auditing the Microsoft Teams approval app interactions finding reusable patterns that be translated into word.

Group 1321316454.png

Happy path to create and send approval request

Frame 2018776672.png

Type 02

Designing mandatory conditional approval request flow

A simple yet extensive rule builder was necessary in order to enable Template creators to define rules within template. These rules automatically creates a mandatory approval request when the rule is met by the document creator that uses the template.

 

eg: 'If the value entered in one of the fields in the document is greater than 20 million then a mandatory approval is needed from finance team'

I have used the principles defined above as a basis to design concepts for the rule builder by asking ourself...

  • How can we make rule creation more conversational and less overwhelming for template creators?

  • How might we ensure that the document creators know that it is mandatory to send for approval if it is enforced from a template without blocking their collaboration or next steps?

Concepts considered for conditional approval setup within template for template creators

01

People first

approach

This was designed with the assumption that the users when creating an approval request would start by identifying the approvers first and then pointing out to the section/rule they need approval for

Frame 2018776673.png

02

Condition first

approach

This was designed with the thought that user might have clarity on weather they want to use a condition vs normal approval request while setting up this mandatory workflow as a part of template

Frame 2018776674.png

Final direction for conditional approval flow setup experience

After initial concept testing with internal users we understood that users mental modal when send an approval request starts by identifying the approvers first and then pointing out to the section/rule they need approval for

Frame 2018776668.png

01

People first
approach

Page end
Current status

The product is in preview currently and more experience delighters and other enhancements such as inline authoring experiences are planned post General availability.

bottom of page