top of page
Frame 1010109850.png
Microsoft 365Backup andRecovery
image 51.png
image 52.png
image 54.png

A backup and restoration solution to enable admins to backup and restore the org’s data from data loss events (accidental deletions, Ransomware attacks, etc.)

Frame 1010109848.png

My role

Design a seamless backup and restoration experience by conducting competitive studies and user interviews. Collaborated with OneDrive, Exchange, SharePoint, and M365 Admin center teams to ensure a cohesive experience. Finally testing concepts with admin users in collaboration with researchers.

The team

1 designer ('tis I ), 3 teams (8 partner stakeholders), 10 Developers, 2 Product managers, 1 researcher, 0.5 Content designer.

Duration

8 months

Outcome

01

Designed the MVP and north star experience for M365 backup, now in Public Preview as part of the Syntex offering launched by Satya Nadella at Ignite 2022.

02

Designed admin product discovery and adoption UX framework and interaction patterns that will now be used across multiple Microsoft admin centres.

Identifyinguser roles, jobsand issues
Frame 1010107223.png

User jobs

Optical disk.png

Backup business critical data

Files, folders, emails, sites, settings, etc. in OneDrive, SharePoint & Exchange.

Inbox tray.png

Quickly recover data from backups

in case of data loss due to accidental deletion or ransomware attacks

Chart increasing.png

Track and manage

Restorations that were started and the storage that was used to take backups

Problems in existing solutions

Four oclock.png

Long setup process

Long and manual process to setup and manage backup settings

Brick.png

No transparency 

Need to guess how much it will cost to backup data and what is the best way to optimise

Compass.png

Low discovery 

Discovery of the product and its value by the admin is very low leading to poor adoption

Frame 1010109850.png
Validatinghypothesisand definingdirection

Learnings from compete study and early concept testing

I have used the customer forum to validate the hypothesis we had from compete study by designing some indicative screens as stimulus.

01

Admins prefer defining backups settings in structured manner by creating backup policies
instead of defining them on an account directly.

02

Admins prefer having control on a service level (OneDrive, Exchange & SharePoint) first to manage backups and to fulfill restoration requests rather than user account level first.

03

Transparency on Cost and time is critical before enabling the service and starting the backup for the selected data

Design principles

After complete study and interviews with users some common themes started to arise which were used to define the design principles based on the user expectations

Parachute.png

Transparency and Trust

Provide visibility on the impact for the actions before hand by setting up expectations upfront

Juggling.png

Consistency and scalability

Maintain similar expectation to back and restore different kinds of data across all services

Stopwatch.png

Efficiency

Reduce manual intervention whenever possible by giving admins ways to automate when needed.

Defininghigh leveluser journey

Along with the core user tasks of backup and recovery an effective discovery framework is also needed to ensure admins see the value of the product in the right context.

Group 1010107222.png

Discovery and adoption experience

Discover value

Evaluate

Traditional discovery and adoption in admin space has the following issues. There are multiple ways to enhance this experience by Identifying contextual moments in the users tasks and finding the right level of interruptions after task completion.

Theme=3D.png

Issue 01

Traditional Top-down selling method

Theme=3D.png

Issue 02

Hard to discover a product pre-purchase

Theme=3D.png

Issue 03

No way to try or experience the product before purchase

Concepts considered

01

Contextual nudges within related tasks

eg: A nudge to explore M365 backup post-identification of affected items in a data loss event flagged by anomaly detection service.

What works
Shows value at the right context after the task completion

What doesn't work
Hard to discover if the user doesn't encounter a data loss event or never interacts with anomaly detection service

Frame 1010109854.png

02

A persistent entry point in the main navigation

Using the same space where the product will be accessed upon purchase to upsell and provide opportunity to learn about it

What works
Does not interrupt the task user is on, provides a space to communicate aspects of product

What doesn't work
Users are expected to proactively learn about the service without external nudge

Frame 1010109856.png

03

Dashboard recommendation

based on usage

An upsell recommendation to try Backup when the number of confidential and active sites grow beyond x% monthly.

What works
High discoverability and provides control to user to quickly get started or opt out of the nudge

What doesn't work
Can come across as an ad and distract the users from not being able to diffrentiate between an insight and an upsell.

Frame 1010109855.png

Final direction for discovery and adoption experience

Chose Concepts 1 and 2 for their contextual approach to convey product usefulness. Excluded Concept 3 (Recommendation card) as it may be perceived as ad and distraction even before admins start to use other features.

Frame 1010109854.png

01

Contextual nudges within related tasks

+

Frame 1010109856.png

02

A persistent entry point in the main navigation
(Short term)

Designing onboarding,

setup and use experience

Setup

Use

To have a strategic home, setup and usage experience we have asked ourselves...

  • What would make users daily life easier?

  • How can we utilize technology to aid users? (Insights on potential data to backup, etc.)

  • Where are the magic moments? The “Ah, I didn’t know I needed that..”

Concepts considered

01

A dynamic dashboard that evolves and guides the user

Enables immediate focus on next steps through intuitive page components, minimizing the need for additional guidance and reducing interface learning time.

Frame 1010109858.png

02

A setup guide to

track progress at one place

Offers a setup progress overview, but redundancy may exist with status communicated through summary cards on the left. Building this is time-consuming as it deviates from standard design system patterns.

Frame 1010109859.png

03

A focussed onboarding experience on day 0

Offers a setup progress overview, but redundancy may exist with status communicated through summary cards on the left. Building this is time-consuming as it deviates from standard design system patterns.

Frame 1010109860.png

Final direction for onboarding, setup and use experience

Frame 1010109858.png

01

A dynamic dashboard that evolves and guides the user

Selected for its reuse of existing components and patterns, crucial for expediting execution. Additionally, the concept's guidance within core UI components minimizes user interface learning time.

Designing retention mechanisms to reinforce impact and value

Track and optimise usage

Having a seamless onboarding experience is essential, but reinforcing value post-usage is equally crucial. The concepts below aim to visualize ways to achieve this goal.

Concepts considered

01

A personalised quarterly report to show impact from use

Frame 1010109864.png

02

Active recommendations to surface opportunities to improve efficiency

Frame 1010109863.png
Frame 1010109880_edited.png
Page end
Current status

As the product is in an MVP phase only certain portions of the phases below were implemented while the rest is phased out for future build based on the usage and feedback from users.

Discover value

(Future scope)

Evaluate

(Future scope)

Setup

(In production)

Use

(In production)

Track and optimise usage

(future scope)

bottom of page